How to Measure Employability Training Outcomes. A Commissioner's Guide
Commissioning employability training is straightforward. Knowing whether it worked is harder. This guide is for commissioners who want to move beyond completion rates to genuine outcome measurement — and who want to know what to expect from a provider that takes outcomes seriously.
The Problem With Completion Rates
Completion rates are the default metric because they are easy to collect. But a programme can have a 90% completion rate and a 15% employment rate. That is not a success.
The things that matter are:
Employment rates at three months
Employment rates at six months
Job sustainability — whether people are still in work at twelve months
For small business programmes: revenue change, customer acquisition, business survival
What to Measure and When
During the programme:
Attendance rate — participants who attend all or most sessions have higher employment rates
Confidence assessment (pre and post) — gives a quantified confidence shift
Digital skills assessment (pre and post) — documents the training impact
At programme end:
Completion documentation
Participant feedback — qualitative and quantitative, capturing confidence and readiness for work
At three months:
Employment status: employed, self-employed, in training, or still seeking
Job type and sector
Business status for small business participants
At six months:
Employment retention — whether participants who got jobs are still in them
Progression — higher hours, better pay, or greater responsibility
Business growth indicators — revenue, customers, any hiring
What Good Reporting Looks Like
Good reporting includes honest numbers — not only the positive cases. It tells you what percentage of participants entered employment, what types of roles, whether they were still employed at follow-up, and what the barriers were for those who did not progress.
At Digital Gum, our reports include:
Attendance data by session
Pre and post confidence and digital skills assessments
Three-month employment status for all participants, including those we could not contact
Six-month employment status where contactable
Case studies that describe real participant journeys, including setbacks
Honest commentary on what worked and what did not
Questions to Ask Any Training Provider
What percentage of your previous cohort participants entered employment within six months?
Do you follow up at six months or only at programme end?
What do you count as an employment outcome?
How do you measure confidence, not just skills?
What is your attendance rate, and your protocol for participants who stop attending?
Can you show me a real outcomes report from a previous cohort?
A provider who cannot answer these questions with specific numbers from their own delivery data is not an outcomes-focused provider.